3 Content Spots You May Have Missed in Your Web Marketing

Smart organizations take the time to produce valuable content, and market it consistently. (Some of them hire me, so I know they’re smart!)

However, I often run across organizations (B2B and sometimes B2i) who misjudge what to write in certain content locations. These content spots are either not seen as valuable, or seen as the sole chance to say EVERYTHING about your product/service.

Obviously both approaches lead to problems. An undervalued content spot is:

  • Left blank
  • Filled up with corporate-speak
  • Given only a meaningless filler sentence or two, OR
  • Becomes the home to a single lonely URL with no explanation.

An overvalued content spot has too much text crammed in. People try to stuff 3 different messages into 200 characters. Er…no.

Below are three such content spots. I’ve included a Common (bad) Use that you shouldn’t do, and a Best Use (an approach that benefits your site – and maybe your brand too).

1. Descriptions on Local Search Engine Listings

Google Places, Yahoo Local, Bing Local. All give you a small space to write about your business.
Common (Bad) Use: Often left blank or home to meaningless filler. Sometimes crammed with keywords (big mistake).
Best Use: Write a small paragraph that gives a high-level overview of your business. Use keywords sparingly. Search engines prefer you use Categories for that.

2. Meta Description Text

This is the short paragraph underneath URLs in search engine results pages. It’s what searchers read before clicking a URL.
Common (Bad) Use: Jammed full of keywords and/or corporate-speak.
Best Use: Ask yourself, “If I read this, how would I know this is the place for getting the product/service I want?” Answer that and you’re two steps from solid description text.

3. Social Media Description Paragraphs

Think Twitter Intro blurbs, the Facebook “Info” tab, and the LinkedIn Profile Introduction.
Common (Bad) Use: Meaningless filler or corporate-speak. Twitter descriptions often have a lonely URL.
Best Use: A short message about what you do. Be as specific as you can. Aim to use just over half of the available space.

Did I miss any? What’s a content spot you’ve seen that organizations overlook (or overvalue)? Post it in a comment. Or tweet it to me at @blueferret.

How (and Where) Will Skimping on Content Cost You?

You may have sacrificed your website’s greatest strength.

I know, I know. You needed to save money. The go-live deadline was breathing down your neck like a rhino with halitosis. Clients are complaining. Just get the site up, we need X Y and Z!

So you went ahead and did it.

You skimped on the content.

(*minor-key piano!*)

Why Did You Do That?!

Maybe you succumbed to the “talk about ourselves” temptation.
Or tasked the writer to come up with a whole website’s content with barebones source material, and wound up with sparse content.
Or maybe you just put content development off until the last minute and wound up missing a piece of the website’s puzzle 3 days before launch.

Whatever the reason, the end result is the same. The website LOOKS great – nice clean layout, colorful, easy to navigate. Except the pages read like an stockbroker’s ledger from 1914.

The (Scary) Reasons Content Gets Low Rung on the Totem Pole

Time – Researching, writing and testing good site content takes time. More time than most people have, given their other tasks each day. More time than they’re willing to give to it too.

Money – The biggest reason. “We can’t afford spending that much on content.” This sort of thinking comes from undervaluing content in the first place. And from…

Under/Overestimating Your Audience – If you assume your audience either doesn’t need to know anything specific about you (overestimated), or they know absolutely nothing about your industry & you must teach them (underestimated), you’re setting yourself up for failure.

Boo!

The Inevitable Cost of Skimping on Content

One way or another, bad content (or worse, mediocre content that acts like it’s helping) bites you back. This can come in a variety of ways.

  • Loss of business
  • The site isn’t able to compete with bigger/more popular competitors
  • Your site launch stumbles – not much search engine traffic, poor rankings
  • Difficulty promoting the site in social media

The worst part of it is, sometimes you can’t feel the bite until much later. When you’re already in panic mode.

Solution? Simple.

When doing any site updates, put content FIRST.

Poll your audience, and respond to their needs. Make and stick to a strategy for updates. Test content if you’re uncertain how effective it’ll be.

Yes, this all takes time and money. It also forces you to prioritize content. Guess what? The Web no longer cares. Skimping will cost you.

(P.S. – I’m aware this sounds like me trying to justify my work. It’s not that; I’m actually pretty busy right now. I’m blogging because I know I’m not alone in this. And my colleagues and I see lots of opportunity just slip past our clients.)

Are you guilty of skimping? Confess below! Were you good and put content first? If you comment you get a Web-cookie.

I Have a Guest Post at CMI on Content Editing!

Part of the reason I haven’t blogged here lately is because I was writing up a guest post for the Content Marketing Institute. (Okay, and working too. That tends to take up time.)

And now that guest post is up! Observe:

How to Avoid a Never-Ending Edit Cycle (The Dangers of “Just a Few More Changes”)

Who should read this?

  • Content Writers, Freelance or Staff
  • Marketing/Marcom Managers
  • Smart Companies Who Use The Above

Why?
It’s a reminder about edits. Specifically, why marketing pros should keep the edit cycle in mind. Why you should have a policy when it comes to every edit cycle. And, in case that doesn’t work and you’re stuck in an endless back-and-forth of “just a few more changes,” how to break that cycle and still come out with content intact.

My sincere thanks to the Content Marketing Institute (and Michele Linn in particular) for being so open and helpful. If your job has anything to do with the creation, publication and online marketing of content, visit www.ContentMarketingInstitute.com for a heap of helpful posts.  With more to come (including from yours truly!)

Why is Content Creation “Someone Else’s Problem” When “Anyone Can Write?”

I went to the Web 2.0 Expo in San Francisco yesterday. Had a good time – talked with all sorts of people, listened to some presentations. I was even surprised by a few things coming up soon in IT.

But one thing stuck out. As far as I could tell, I was the only writer there. (No, that’s not as good a thing as you think. Keep reading.)

What’s worse is, I heard talk about content. About aggregating it, managing it, distributing it…

But NOTHING about creating it!

Microblogging, mobile apps, social platforms, CMSes…

…so when’s the content enter the picture? You know, the stuff around which all of those are supposedly built?

“That’s Someone Else’s Problem.” Are You Sure?

I started asking people where they get their content. Who writes it, who photographs it, who designs it and lays it out all nice and neat?

The answers I got were slightly troubling.

  • Blank stares
  • “Marketing/Web Dev handles that. I don’t know.” (A sales rep at a major expo tells me this?)
  • Acquired from customer
  • “Not my problem.” (Yes, someone actually said this to me.)

Admittedly, I didn’t question everyone. But not one person told me that they or someone they knew directly was responsible for content creation. Arguably the most important part of any website, marketing strategy, or lead generation material (for, say, a big convention expo)…and nobody knew where it came from!

Look, I’m a writer. I admit that a lot of my livelihood is invested in this topic. But this sort of willful ignorance worries me. When there’s a disconnect between content creation and content use, its effectiveness is drastically lowered.

So “Anyone Can Write” But No One Is?

Let me change focus here a second. The second-biggest objection to outsourcing a content writer is the notion that “anyone” can write content. (The biggest is cost, if you wondered.)

With that in mind, consider the mindset of “someone else’s problem.” If you don’t care about content creation, and you think anyone can write about it? What does that mean?

It means you don’t value your own company’s message.

And if you don’t…then why would you expect customers to?

Worried yet?

6 Questions to Ask 30 Days AFTER Your Marketing Campaign Starts

I thought about writing a long article today. Then I remembered that my audience knows a thing or two about marketing in the first place.

So I decided on a short “reminder” post today. Reminders on what you should check after your marketing campaign starts (not before!).

  1. Is our marketing working?
    (Are you getting anything like the results you aimed for?)
  2. Are our goals the same now?
    (Has a new goal or priority come up since this started?)
  3. What do our customers think?
    (See what’s said on social media. Collect email responses. Record phone calls. Put all of this in one place and analyze it.)
  4. Are we on track for the future?
    (If the campaign response rate is already tapering off, you’ll need to pick up the pace.)
  5. Is this adding value to other pursuits?
    (The campaign’s responses should be usable in other pursuits, e.g. older lead revitalization.)
  6. Should we change tactics, or keep going?
    (Weigh your metrics against your campaign goals. If the content isn’t pulling well enough, try a different angle.)

That’s it. Just a few reminders. Success with content marketing these days takes much more than just good writing. But too often companies set the campaign up and just wait for leads. Or worse, forget about it and rush on to the next task.

Revisit those campaigns. I do it 30 days after start. Sometimes 2 months afterward is better though (for bigger campaigns).

And remember…no response at all? Is still a response.

More on that next time.

« Previous PageNext Page »