I thought about writing a long article today. Then I remembered that my audience knows a thing or two about marketing in the first place.

So I decided on a short “reminder” post today. Reminders on what you should check after your marketing campaign starts (not before!).

  1. Is our marketing working?
    (Are you getting anything like the results you aimed for?)
  2. Are our goals the same now?
    (Has a new goal or priority come up since this started?)
  3. What do our customers think?
    (See what’s said on social media. Collect email responses. Record phone calls. Put all of this in one place and analyze it.)
  4. Are we on track for the future?
    (If the campaign response rate is already tapering off, you’ll need to pick up the pace.)
  5. Is this adding value to other pursuits?
    (The campaign’s responses should be usable in other pursuits, e.g. older lead revitalization.)
  6. Should we change tactics, or keep going?
    (Weigh your metrics against your campaign goals. If the content isn’t pulling well enough, try a different angle.)

That’s it. Just a few reminders. Success with content marketing these days takes much more than just good writing. But too often companies set the campaign up and just wait for leads. Or worse, forget about it and rush on to the next task.

Revisit those campaigns. I do it 30 days after start. Sometimes 2 months afterward is better though (for bigger campaigns).

And remember…no response at all? Is still a response.

More on that next time.

 

“Can you guarantee your content will help us out? Like, you’re sure it will boost our traffic?”
“No.”

Woah, woah, hold on. Why did I say THAT? Isn’t that like shooting yourself in the professional kneecap? Don’t I know how bad this could make me look to clients?

Sure I’m aware. But there’s a simple reason why I don’t “guarantee” my content’s results.

Because it’s impossible.

It’s impossible to guarantee a big result – or ANY result – from any one single piece of content.

Content Evolves With Your Results

It’s 2010. Content is no longer a “put it up and await the flood” item.

Everything must change over time. Testing, analytics, feedback…all of this is done to inspire changes in your website’s performance. Sometimes it works, and you get lots of qualified traffic. Sometimes it doesn’t, and you need to figure out where you’re bleeding visitors.

What gets changed for all this? The content. We have A/B tests for a reason.

No Phony Guarantees Please, We’re After Real-World Results

Anyone who claims they can guarantee X amount of traffic or X number of sales from content (or SEO, or emails)…is lying to you. They’re just after your money.

More importantly, they’re not interested in making a real effort towards effective content.

Why would they be? They can just slap a guarantee on the front, deliver content and walk away. Oh, it didn’t work for you? Hey, I guaranteed the content works. What did YOU do to screw it up? Sorry, no discounts on edits.

This kind of behavior really burns me (and most everyone else I’m sure!). Fortunately it’s rare.

But the “guaranteed ROI” mentality isn’t.

So keep this in mind. I will gladly work with clients to improve their content. I’ll happily edit my own work for better effectiveness. (Believe me, there’ve been times when I look at older work and think, “What was I ON then?”)

But I don’t guarantee results from the vastness of the Web. Nobody can. I just write my best and revisit it later.

Speaking of, I think I’ll blog about things to check on after new content’s up. Coming up next.

Meanwhile, have you experienced this kind of situation? Did you receive a “guarantee” that turned sour? Please share it in a comment. Or send it to me on Twitter at @blueferret.

 

In this corner, “Telling Stories!”
And in this corner, “Bullet Lists!”

(“Long copy!” “Short copy!” No, no, you guys aren’t in this one.)

For years now, writers and marketers have argued back and forth about what’s the more persuasive writing method. Many advocate telling stores in your content. Others look to the old stalwart “The Bullet List” to get points across fast.

There’s no way I could settle the entire debate with one blog post, so no, I’m not trying that. I’m just responding to one part of it, in the form of a question:
“Are there circumstances where one trumps the other?”

My response: Yes, there are. It all depends on where and when these methods are best employed.

What Factors Would Make Telling a Story More Persuasive (Or Bullet Lists)?

(Note: This post assumes a B2B audience.)

To hash this out, I’m detailing the persuasive power of telling a story vs. using bullet lists in terms of why an audience reads and what persuasion tactic the method employs.

1. Why An Audience Reads: What’s the reader’s main focus when they arrive at your content? What do they want out of it?
2. Persuasion Tactic Employed: What type of persuasive approach suits this method best? What will compel the reader to act the most?

TELLING STORIES
Why Read: When a reader comes across your story, it’s because you grabbed their interest with your subject. With B2B, they’re usually reading because they have a problem & are curious about you solving it.

Persuasion Tactic: Stories are a great way to emotionally involve others. They persuade via “Liking” – a principle that compels us to say yes to someone if we like and/or identify with them. The easiest way to do this is to admit that you (or your client) had a similar problem to the one that brought the reader. “Oh good,” they think. “I’m not alone here. How’d they solve it?”

BULLET LISTS
Why Read: Bullet lists have been around so long that everyone perceives them as straightforward information on a central topic. If people are reading bullet lists, they’re looking for information on that topic.

Persuasion Tactic: Because of this perception, bullets persuade via authority. We often look to an “expert” to show us the way to go. Using bulleted lists to back up your position/sales point carries the impression that you know what you’re talking about. (Which you’d better.)

When Stories are More Persuasive

When it comes to web content, I prefer using stories in blog posts, homepages, use cases and branding.
Case studies (one of my favorite projects) are pretty much one big story about 1 problem.
Even white papers can take advantage of storytelling. Best place for them is introducing the paper’s solution by giving a real-world example. Like a miniature case study inside the white paper.

When Bullets are More Persuasive

Bullet lists have more prominence (and more weight) in white papers and more content-rich websites. These are resources where readers will come seeking information. Give it straight and give a lot of it. Well-structured for easy reference, of course (that’s what the bullets are for).

These aren’t rules. (If they were, I’d have already broken them years ago.) But the principles are backed up by psychology, illustrious resources such as Robert Cialdini and Copyblogger.com, and my own experiences.

What’s your experience? Which is more persuasive to you? Leave a comment and let’s discuss it.

 

Earlier today I had one of ‘those’ moments with a prospective client. You’ll see which one shortly.

I was on the phone with him discussing a new client relationship. He wants to improve his site’s SEO. Sure, no problem. I start asking the usual questions – what kind of content does he want, who’s the audience…

Then I hear this. “Audience? Huh? We just want whatever it takes to get to the top of Google.”

Uhm…

Thinking to myself, ‘Didn’t we dislodge this attitude from the business world in 2002?’ I asked the prospect to clarify. To what kind of customers do you sell? What motivates them to buy?

Dead silence.

Then, he says something that makes my teeth hurt. “I know what the customers want. This is how we’ll do it.”

Er…hold on a second, Mr. Genius. You’ve admitted to me that sales stink. The phones aren’t ringing. Nobody’s updated your website or sent an email in months. You’re after immediate action and (wait for it) – immediate results.

And on top of all this…you already know what customers want?

No. You don’t know what your customers want. You know what YOU want – money, success, days off, etc. Your customers want entirely different things – products that work, services that do such-and-such job, relief from the headache of dealing with Problem X.

They want this relief to come from you. And they don’t CARE what YOU want.

I believe this is the biggest problem with marketing today. B2B, B2C, doesn’t matter. Too many companies fail to consider their customers’ desires. They just superimpose their own.

It’s tough to crawl out of your head and into someone else’s. Very tough to try on a customer’s mindset and figure out what they want, and how to speak to them about it. Believe me, I know. That’s why there are marketing experts (like me) to do it FOR you.

But no. It’s easy (and cheap) to just assume you know what customers want. And then act from there. And then wonder why your marketing doesn’t convert.

It’s entirely possible to get what you want as a business owner/VP/startup guy-of-all-trades. People do every day. But in order to do that you must give customers what they’re after. It takes imagination, effort and patience to link the two up.

Sometimes I’m able to demonstrate how the two link up, and get myself a new client (yay!). Sometimes I’m not (like today).

Here, some free advice. We have dozens of channels to communicate with all types of audiences nowadays (email, social media, phones, old-fashioned networking, etc.). Want to find out what your customers want? ASK THEM.

Now, how many of you were nodding your head at what I’ve said? Please, sound off in the comments. Let’s have a minute of shared frustration before we get back to work.

 

Pardon my temporary soapbox-climb, but I felt compelled to post about this today.

As a web writer – and someone who hasn’t read an actual print newspaper in years – I have a bit of apathy toward print.

However, with the “death of print” hullabaloo all around us like a flock of poisoned crows, I am worried about one thing.

The press, the print industry, the “news media” as it was known for centuries, had another name. The Fourth Estate. Named so by Thomas Carlyle in 1841 (he attributed it to Edmund Burke in 1792), it served as a check against corruption, against crime and against dilution of information.

My worry is this. If the Fourth Estate does die…what then becomes the check against these societal problems?

Right now I don’t think we have a counterpart on the Web. We have the collective blogosphere, and I’ll be the first to admit it’s powerful. But it’s not where it should be to replace the Fourth Estate – to become the Fifth Estate, essentially.

Why? Because the news media could be everywhere at once. TV, print and radio. Its power comes from its ability to activate public awareness even in the far corners of society.

An equal percentage of people get their news from TV (38%) or from the Web (39%). This 2008 Pew Research report tells us that newspaper readership has dropped to a third (34%). Assuming some overlap, print and TV still outpace the Web by a good chunk.

We’re not there yet. We could be soon; I think social media and more real-time advancements will help a lot in the coming years. (Some work hammering out content standards wouldn’t hurt either, but that’s the writer in me talking.)

I’m thrilled we have as many communications channels as we do. We’re in the midst of a huge transition because of them – better news, better marketing, better ways to connect. What we’ll need in the future is some standards for Fourth Estate-level solidarity. And plans for taking action when just talking online isn’t enough.

</off soapbox>

© 2012 Blue Ferret Communications Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha