This may sound like a rant. In a sense it is – but one done as a serious warning.

A job ad appeared in my inbox a couple days ago. It matches one of my Google Alerts, so I glanced through. Cloud services provider in Southern California, okay. Looking for a Web Content Writer. I’m not looking for full-time, but I might know someone…

Then I saw this.

“Fresh graduates encouraged to apply.”

*Insert record-scratch sound here!*

No pay listed. But considering that line, I think it’s a low-salary gig.

Worse still – looks like they don’t value web content very much.

Going Cheap on Content Means You Don’t See Content’s Value

Wanting a fresh college grad to write content might make business sense, in terms of ROI and budget. But if you’re looking at content as an expense, your values are messed up.
Putting one college grad in charge of content creation just to save money? It means web content is “low man on the totem pole” at your office.

Let me say it another way.

You’ve placed the lowest priority on the most powerful marketing tool available.

(Please note – I’m NOT saying this to belittle college grads. We would not have Google or Twitter without them! I just don’t think they should be the ones writing content, if that content is not valued by their employer.)

Low Value on Content, Low Respect for Readers

There’s danger in devaluing web content.

More content is created now than ever before. Much of it is so poorly-written that it’s lost in the swamps of Low Traffic Land.

Why? Because the writers (and their work) were not valued by the organization.

The attitude isn’t new; Brain Traffic addressed it in 2009. It’s pervasive though. And it doesn’t stop there.

Not valuing content suggests one scary thing: You don’t value your audience either.

Giving content creation to someone fresh out of academia? Who’s had little (if any) real-world experience with marketing and user research?

Readers will think your company doesn’t know what they’re doing!

Don’t Dump the Foundation of Marketing (Content) on “The New Guy” & Forget About It

Content creation is not rocket science, I admit. But it isn’t easy either.

If you’re just throwing words on a webpage, you’re missing out on a huge chunk of persuasive power.

Content’s real power comes from:

  • Understanding your reader (user research)
  • Employing content strategy to convert readers, capture leads, develop them into sales, and build a regular client base
  • Taking into account everything from audience interest points to SEO to future content

All of this is part of content creation. But you won’t reap these benefits if you don’t value it.

Throwing one inexperienced person at web content? You devalue the content, and risk insulting your audience. The people who keep you in business.

Have you encountered this before? Businesses that treat content like a low-value commodity?
Was your impression of their business affected as a result?

 

Rejoice! I’m giving a talk February 21st on Confusing Content vs. Clear Content.

The talk is a Twitter Chat (plus audio), put on by the tireless folks at Global Product Management Talk. It’s been titled, “The Battle Against Cryptic Web Content.”

(I didn’t come up with that, but I really like it!)

The Details: Who (Me), What (The Future of Web Content), Why (Because it’s Fun!)

Global Product Management Talk hosts a weekly combination radio show/Twitter Chat session. They discuss product management, product marketing and related issues. Attendee numbers range from several dozen to the several thousand, depending on the topic.

Cindy Solomon contacted me a while back. She was interested in having me speak about jargon, what I mean by “Clear Content” and so on. Now who’d pass that up? Not this copywriter!

What We’ll Discuss: Jargon VS. Human in Content Creation

Like my blog, the focus will be on Clear Content (informal, more human-language web writing) and Confusing Content (jargon, business-speak, The Insufferable Evil, call it what you will).

It’s an interactive session – I’m here to talk about my work AND answer questions.

Will the B2B content standard shift toward human language in the future?
Will large companies fight for their business-speak?
Does the content’s voice influence buyer decisions?

All these questions are fair game. Log onto the Twitter Chat and join in the discussion!

How to Catch the Clear Content Chat

First, say that ten times fast. No, you don’t have to. Here’s how to take part in the Twitter Chat. Either:

Go to http://www.prodmgmttalk.com for the full scoop on how to join.
OR
Follow the hashtag #ProdMgmtTalk on Twitter. (You can also follow @prodmgmttalk or myself [@blueferret] on Twitter.)

If you want to hear me blather on, head to http://www.blogtalkradio.com/prodmgmttalk for the (live!) audio stream.

The chat will start on Tuesday, February 21st at 3pm PST.

The official press release is here: http://www.prlog.org/11799123-the-global-product-management-talk-on-the-battle-against-cryptic-web-content.html

Tune in on Tuesday at 3. And bring your content questions!

 

Bore Your Readers with Mindless Drivel, or Tell a Story and Engage Them

Does your “About Us” page tell a story? If not, you’re wasting a webpage.

Whenever I go through the website of a potential client, I make notes on what I see. What they’re saying. What they’re not saying.

I always visit the About page too.

After the homepage, it’s the most frustrating. Because 9 times out of 10, it’s just like all the others.

Is Your About Page “Unique Like Everyone Else’s?”

The core purpose of an About page is to tell readers what you do. And who’s doing it.

You’re introducing the people you think customers should know about. Who they’ll have a working relationship with.

The sort of information that shows you’re a good fit for them.

Thing is, most companies wind up wasting the page.

They throw up some names, add bios, and think that’s enough. All that does is create a clone of every other About page.

Worse still, a lot of these pages are written using the same thoughtless, jargon-choked statements.

Here, some examples. Any of these look familiar?

“We are committed to the highest quality service.”
So’s everyone else. Meaningless claim.

“We’re constantly upgrading our skills.”
So you don’t have any time for work, then?

“Real people who pick up when you call.”
(Ever notice that when they say this, it’s really hard to get a callback?)

“Your best choice for XYZ.”
Bold claim. Got any proof?
Oh, and see my “thought leader” post about why this type of thinking is bunk.

“Redefining quality service through world-class innovations.”
Wow. You took 7 words to say nothing at all.

An About Alternative: Tell Your Readers a Story

Chances are, “About Us” is the 2nd or 3rd most-visited page on your site. So why not give people content people would enjoy reading?

Like a story. You do know your company’s story right? How the business came to be, where the people came from, what motivated them to join your company?

This is the place to tell it.

Your story is your guiding principle. The sails for your ship.

Here’s an example of what I mean. This is an “About Story” I wrote up for a 2-man software startup. It was completely redone before it went live, so this version should be safe to post. (Some details altered/removed, of course.)

LicenseHound is a software license tracker app for Windows and Linux. Made by Jeff B and Mel C.

Jeff and Mel met through a mutual graphic-designer friend. Jeff wanted to start a side business doing specialty programming in C#. Mel worked for an SEO agency.

They hung out for a while, beat each other at videos games, and talked their way through lots of ideas. Eventually they found one they both liked. So they pooled their talents to make the app, and a website to sell it.

It’s now on the Android Market. (That’s probably how you got here.)

Welcome! Head to the App Details page to see how LicenseHound works.

I see this happening more & more with startups and newer companies.

For instance: “What is Spotify?”

This is a prime example of Clear Content. The About page tells you exactly what to expect from Spotify’s service. They show it to you with images & word paintings. And they encourage you to try it all out.

Another About Us example is MailChimp.

That giant monkey might scare a kid or two, but the content is great. Short, lively, and it talks casually about which customers are a good fit for them.

Both these examples also link off to subpages, too. Getting more specific. Guiding the reader on to further information.

In other words, they start telling you their story.

Does your About page do that?

 

Next post, I’ll share a framework to help you write your own “About Us” Story.

 

I took a break from a new post to listen to Content Talks. Episode 9, with Mike Monteiro, to be precise.

The topic was the business of design. But along the way, they mentioned UnSuck-It.com.

I’d never heard of it before. (Which, given this blog, is outright bizarre!)

So of course I checked it out. The site is a database of witty common-sense alternatives for jargon terms. Rewritten – “unsucked” – so they make sense.

I am ecstatic to see this. Not only did we badly need this out there, but it means I don’t have to build it myself! (I did have a similar idea in my notes.)

Whoever wrote the ‘unsucked’ explanations deserves a medal. Lots of great sarcasm to quash any jargon-user’s (self-)righteous fury.

I’ll quote a few examples:

Gamification

-Unsucked: “A popular product strategy fantasy about turning every mundane task into Farmville.”
My Comment: While balancing work and play is healthy, the fact that ‘gamification’ exists worries me.

Red Flag

-Unsucked: “Concern.”
My Comment: If you’re in Texas, you can use this. (It’s in the state business code, I think.) Everywhere else? It’s just a concern.

Social Media Strategy

-Unsucked: “Typing into text areas.”
My Comment: Heehee! Hey, wait a second…

Solution

-Unsucked: “Software. Please, just call it software.”
My Comment: Yes! We even have extra add-ons to make it clearer! Software program, software application…a “solution” is what you reach after USING the software!

Take It to the Next Level

-Unsucked: “Improve it.”
My Comment: Hatred of this term has sustained me for years.

“Unsuck” Your Content Before Posting It

I happily recommend this site to everyone writing content. If you’re using a term that’s listed on UnSuck-It.com, reconsider.

Can you be clearer? Chances are you can. Then your content won’t suck.

Next time I’ll write on content development for startups. (Product’s not the only thing you’ll need to work out!) Watch for it soon.

While you wait, why not follow me on Twitter or add Blue Ferret’s Clear Content Writing to your RSS?

 

The Hidden Dangers of Using Jargon, Example 4

Last week the Content Strategy Google Group (of which I’m a member) discussed the term “thought leadership.”

Everyone in the group (and most people reading this) pegged ‘Thought Leader’ as jargon. Even a client rejected it for a category header.

“My problem is everyone in my industry (other than us) seems to use that term, so my firm is rejecting that outright.”

So, what should they use instead?
Some group members proposed alternatives, like:

  • Knowledge Center
  • Reader Resources
  • [Subject] White Papers
  • Our Publications (I kind of like this one)

Then the conversation swung toward Thought Leadership’s underlying problem: The implications you make if you use the term ‘thought leader.’

Has Anyone Ever Done Business with a “Thought Follower”?

When used, Thought Leadership claims a hierarchical position. Namely, the top.

But nobody claims a “thought follower” position, do they? Of course not. No one would.

Well, we can’t ALL be Thought Leaders. What do we do?

“Thought Leader” as a jargon term tries to claim the high ground. Like everyone else. So the classification goes flat. Being a Thought Leader among thousands is kind of useless, isn’t it?

In the group discussion, one person pointed out that this whole thing is meaningless. Why? Because readers aren’t interested in these kinds of classifications.

At all.

They just want to find information on a specific topic.

Which is the only thing that really matters. Are you able to deliver information on that topic? If yes, then you don’t become a thought leader to the reader.
You become a resource.

Be a Resource Instead of a Thought Leader

If “Thought Leadership” implies a hierarchy that doesn’t really exist, how should we classify ourselves? What will the reader respond to?

If you have the information they’re looking for on a topic, you become a resource to them. So, aim for that!

Try being a resource instead. It’s more specific, and more valuable. For example, you could be:

“A resource for financial management software for HR consultancies.”

This fosters more of a collaborative space online, not an arbitrary hierarchy. Resources share information & audience attention with other resources, instead of competing for every last second.

One resource aids another. One website sends traffic to others. People find more and more information as they go – noting the businesses that PROVIDE those resources.

Readers don’t look for thought leaders. They look for specific resources.

Do YOU go looking for thought leaders? I don’t. I look for information from Kristina Halvorson (for Content Strategy), or John Jantsch (for B2B marketing), or Brian Clark (for Web writing techniques & Internet marketing strategies) or Steve Slaunwhite (for the business of copywriting).

Because these people have made resources of their websites. And by extension, their businesses. Last I checked, none of them are hurting either!

There’s no high ground in the term “thought leader.” Readers don’t care. They DO care about good resources. Look at social media – people share resources all the time, every day. Isn’t that a more powerful marketing approach than using jargon?

Look at your content. Ask yourself: “Is this something the reader can use? How? When?” If your content answers those questions, you have the makings of a resource.

What could your business be a resource for? A product you made? A specific audience? A region?

(DISCLAIMER: I wrote this post as a comment on the CS group discussion. These opinions are my own and are NOT intended as a reflection of the group. It was a great discussion!)

© 2012 Blue Ferret Communications Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha